W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-forms@w3.org > April 2006

RE: Reminder for send comments and issues

From: Klotz, Leigh <Leigh.Klotz@xerox.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 11:56:12 -0700
Message-ID: <E254B0A7E0268949ABFE5EA97B7D0CF401B2C263@usa7061ms01.na.xerox.net>
To: "Mark Birbeck" <mark.birbeck@x-port.net>, <www-forms@w3.org>

I see.  It's like we need the context for the ::repeat-item CSS3

-----Original Message-----
From: www-forms-request@w3.org [mailto:www-forms-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Mark Birbeck
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 11:48 AM
To: www-forms@w3.org
Subject: RE: Reminder for send comments and issues

Hi Leigh,

> So on the balance I'd say we don't need a no-arg version, just because

> the defaulting rules would be confusing.
> But if you or someone else says it's useful and clear, that's fine 
> with me too.

Oops...sorry for causing confusion! That's not what I'm suggesting. I'll
retrace our steps.

My initial point (after your initial point...) was that your example was
just a special case of the more general problem that once you do
something to change the context you have no way to get back to a prior
context. You suggested getting round it in the specific example of
repeats by having available to you the node that is the current repeat
item, but in my view it would be more 'correct' (at least in the example
as you wrote it) to be able to know the context of the parent evaluation

This was mainly because there are many other situations where this
arises: the group example that I gave before; using itemsets; labels on
triggers; the @iterate attribute that David proposed, and so on.

So, my initial suggestion was to have a function that can get any level
of evaluation context. But after your comments I thought that actually,
most use cases seem to be covered by the ability to get the parent
context, and a very specifically named function like "parent-context()"
might be better.
This would leave the context() function free to take an ID as a
parameter--and *only* an ID--in the way that you suggested.

However, as far as I can see, this function wouldn't help your use case,
since I'm still sure that you need to be able to go back up the
hierarchy of contexts. The context() function would only give you the
evaluation context for the element with that ID, which is effectively
the context that the repeat is 'in', not the context that the repeat



Mark Birbeck
x-port.net Ltd.

e: Mark.Birbeck@x-port.net
t: +44 (0) 20 7689 9232
b: http://internet-apps.blogspot.com/
w: http://www.formsPlayer.com/

Download our XForms processor from
Received on Monday, 10 April 2006 18:57:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:36:17 UTC