On 4/7/06, Klotz, Leigh <Leigh.Klotz@xerox.com> wrote: > On my point 3, xforms-value-changed may occur more frequently than > desired if I read the rec correctly. How's that? > Did you think that group/action[@ref='xyz' & > @event='xforms-enabled]/load would be wrong? It seems to be the closest > to the author's intent, as the relevance of 'xyz' can be set with > bind/@relevant by the form author. Using > output[@event='xforms-value-changed'/load limits the control to a single > instance node, which means the determination of the condition to do > redirect is back on the instance document generating side (server), and > if that's the case we might as well just have the server calculate the > whole URI. Good point. Relevant might be more suited. -- ... AllanReceived on Tuesday, 11 April 2006 10:27:13 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 10 March 2012 06:22:03 GMT