W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-forms@w3.org > November 2004

RE: XForms 1.1 Working Draft Now Online - Comments?

From: Roland Merrick <roland_merrick@uk.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 08:57:46 +0000
To: "Thompson, Bryan B." <BRYAN.B.THOMPSON@saic.com>
Cc: "Bebee, Bradley R." <BRADLEY.R.BEBEE@saic.com>, "Thompson, Bryan B." <BRYAN.B.THOMPSON@saic.com>, "'Bjoern Hoehrmann '" <derhoermi@gmx.net>, "'www-forms@w3.org '" <www-forms@w3.org>, www-forms-request@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF7FED5A14.A2C823AA-ON80256F50.002F3178-80256F50.0030E83E@uk.ibm.com>
Greetings Bryan, the 1.1 spec is only a delta to the XForms 1.0 
Recommendation and as such relatively small.

Regards, Roland

"Thompson, Bryan B." <BRYAN.B.THOMPSON@saic.com> 
Sent by: www-forms-request@w3.org
17/11/2004 19:38

"'Bjoern Hoehrmann '" <derhoermi@gmx.net>, "Thompson, Bryan B." 
"'www-forms@w3.org '" <www-forms@w3.org>, "Bebee, Bradley R." 
RE: XForms 1.1 Working Draft Now Online - Comments?

Ah.  So I had incorrectly understood things.  I thought that the 1.0
was a recent rec and that there was going to be a quiet period for the
WG while people gained experience with the 1.0.

I would like to see a diff between the 1.0 and the 1.1 versions.  As
an AC rep, I will be glad to comment on this.  We are quite interested
in XForms, and the primary shortcomings that we saw in the 1.0 were
sufficient support for HTTP applications such as Atom.



-----Original Message-----
From: Bjoern Hoehrmann
To: Thompson, Bryan B.
Cc: www-forms@w3.org
Sent: 11/17/2004 2:07 PM
Subject: Re: XForms 1.1 Working Draft Now Online - Comments?

* Thompson, Bryan B. wrote:
>Yes, I seem to have somehow completely missed the call for
>in this activity. -bryan

The Call for Participation was January 2003, the current XForms WG
Charter expires next month, XForms 1.1 was supposed to be a Rec in
September 2004...
Received on Thursday, 18 November 2004 08:55:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:36:14 UTC