- From: Thompson, Bryan B. <BRYAN.B.THOMPSON@saic.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 14:38:33 -0500
- To: 'Bjoern Hoehrmann ' <derhoermi@gmx.net>, "Thompson, Bryan B." <BRYAN.B.THOMPSON@saic.com>
- Cc: "'www-forms@w3.org '" <www-forms@w3.org>, "Bebee, Bradley R." <BRADLEY.R.BEBEE@saic.com>
Ah. So I had incorrectly understood things. I thought that the 1.0 was a recent rec and that there was going to be a quiet period for the WG while people gained experience with the 1.0. I would like to see a diff between the 1.0 and the 1.1 versions. As an AC rep, I will be glad to comment on this. We are quite interested in XForms, and the primary shortcomings that we saw in the 1.0 were sufficient support for HTTP applications such as Atom. Thanks, -bryan -----Original Message----- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann To: Thompson, Bryan B. Cc: www-forms@w3.org Sent: 11/17/2004 2:07 PM Subject: Re: XForms 1.1 Working Draft Now Online - Comments? * Thompson, Bryan B. wrote: >Yes, I seem to have somehow completely missed the call for participation >in this activity. -bryan The Call for Participation was January 2003, the current XForms WG Charter expires next month, XForms 1.1 was supposed to be a Rec in September 2004...
Received on Wednesday, 17 November 2004 19:39:12 UTC