W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-forms-editor@w3.org > September 2007

Re: [XForms 1.1] i18n comment: Responsibility for useability of IRIs unclear (PR#13)

From: (wrong string) é <xforms-issues@mn.aptest.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 09:43:40 -0500
Message-Id: <200709131443.l8DEheBe010203@htmlwg.mn.aptest.com>
To: fsasaki@w3.org
CC: www-forms-editor@w3.org

Felix,

due to other last call comments, src was moved from host language control to
XForms, where it is governed by rules of xsd:anyURI from schema 1.0. Since
Schema 1.0 doesn't support IRIs clearly and completely we don't reference the
IRI RFC.

Regards,
Ulrich Nicolas Lissé

For the Forms WG

> Comment from the i18n review of:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-xforms11-20070222/
> 
> Comment 4
> At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0704-xforms11/
> Editorial/substantive: S
> Location in reviewed document:
> 3.2.2
> Responsibility for useability of IRIs unclear
> 
> Comment:
> 
>   The host language may permit a Linking Attributes Collection to be  
> applied to XForms elements as an alternate means of obtaining content  
> related to the element. An example is the src attribute from [XHTML 1.0].  
> The schedule by which link traversal occurs is defined by the host  
> language. If the link traversal fails, the host language may dispatch  
> xforms-link-exception or xforms-link-error to the model associated with  
> the in-scope evaluation context node of the element that bears the Linking  
> Attributes Collection for the failed link.
> 
> Does this mean that the host language is responsible whether XForms allows  
> for using
> IRIs [http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3987.txt]
>   or not? Please answer this question in the specification and provide a  
> reference (normative or informative, depending on the answer) to the IRI  
> specification.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Thursday, 13 September 2007 14:45:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 10 June 2009 18:12:16 GMT