W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-font@w3.org > July to September 2009

Re: Next step?

From: Thomas Lord <lord@emf.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 10:21:27 -0700
To: Fran├žois REMY <fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr>
Cc: Thomas Phinney <tphinney@cal.berkeley.edu>, www-font@w3.org
Message-Id: <1250097687.6312.28.camel@dell-desktop.example.com>
On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 15:52 +0200, Fran├žois REMY wrote:
> <<
>     An User-Agent supporting web fonts SHOULD support WebOTF, EOTL
>     and naked fonts.
> 
>     An User-Agent supporting web fonts MUST support at least two of
> the
>     three specified formats.
> >>

That leaves the number of formats that are
portable-per-requirement at 0.

Of the three potentially portable-per-requirement
formats, none would be guaranteed to work on all
conforming UAs.

-t
Received on Wednesday, 12 August 2009 17:22:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 11 June 2011 00:14:03 GMT