- From: Thomas Lord <lord@emf.net>
- Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 10:18:40 -0700
- To: Thomas Phinney <tphinney@cal.berkeley.edu>
- Cc: www-font@w3.org
On Tue, 2009-08-11 at 23:34 -0700, Thomas Phinney wrote: > Yes, I know that some folks want naked font support to be a MUST. But > given that MS won't accept that, Please keep an open mind and give them the benefit of the doubt that as the problem space has become and continues to become better understood, they might change their mind. Conversely, they might come up with something that hasn't been seen: a compelling rationale for why TTF/OTF should NOT be a MUST. The awkward outcome is if they both fail to change their mind and fail to come up with a compelling rationale. Hopefully all parties agree to try to avoid that awkward outcome. -t
Received on Wednesday, 12 August 2009 17:19:21 UTC