W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-font@w3.org > July to September 2009

RE: WebOTF Proposal

From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 22:33:18 +0000
To: "robert@ocallahan.org" <robert@ocallahan.org>, Ben Weiner <ben@readingtype.org.uk>
CC: www-font <www-font@w3.org>
Message-ID: <045A765940533D4CA4933A4A7E32597E02179EA9@TK5EX14MBXC120.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Fwiw, it was also never a goal of the EOTL proposal to replace anything, or even suggest that it should do so.

From: www-font-request@w3.org [mailto:www-font-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Robert O'Callahan
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 3:22 PM
To: Ben Weiner
Cc: www-font
Subject: Re: WebOTF Proposal

On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 10:13 AM, Ben Weiner <ben@readingtype.org.uk<mailto:ben@readingtype.org.uk>> wrote:
I take it that the this would completely replace TTF/OTF as EOTL would.

To be clear, whatever additional formats we support in Gecko in the future, I don't think any of us Gecko developers would consider dropping support for bare TTF/OTF. (I don't think we've ever intimated we would, but perhaps people misunderstood.)
Rob
--
"He was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities; the punishment that brought us peace was upon him, and by his wounds we are healed. We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of us has turned to his own way; and the LORD has laid on him the iniquity of us all." [Isaiah 53:5-6]
Received on Thursday, 6 August 2009 22:34:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 11 June 2011 00:14:03 GMT