W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-font@w3.org > July to September 2009

RE: EOT & DMCA concerns

From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 22:05:50 +0000
To: "Levantovsky, Vladimir" <Vladimir.Levantovsky@MonotypeImaging.com>
CC: "www-font@w3.org" <www-font@w3.org>
Message-ID: <045A765940533D4CA4933A4A7E32597E02160F47@TK5EX14MBXC111.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-font-request@w3.org [mailto:www-font-request@w3.org] On
> Behalf Of Levantovsky, Vladimir
> Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 2:58 PM
> To: Håkon Wium Lie; Tab Atkins Jr.
> Cc: Thomas Lord; Thomas Phinney; John Hudson; www-font@w3.org
> Subject: RE: EOT & DMCA concerns
>
> Would the name EOT-Neue or something similar alleviate your concern?
> Support for a new version of something doesn't imply any obligation to
> support older one.
>
> Vlad

I think the idea is to drop the reference to EOT altogether. It's XYZ 1.0 and
it's compatible with legacy browsers. Then 2.0 would be the nextgen long term'
.webfont/ZOT successor. That's the message I'm getting anyway.
Received on Tuesday, 4 August 2009 22:06:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 11 June 2011 00:14:03 GMT