RE: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1

On Friday, July 31, 2009 4:33 PM Sylvain Galineau wrote:
> 
> > Unless we reach a consensus for MTX to become part of EOT-Lite, and
> > then
> > patented technology is licensed on unrestricted RF terms and is no
> > longer an issue, as is the case with any other W3C Recommendation.
> 
> Until such a consensus exists and the proposal is edited to reflect
it,
> An EOTL implementation conforming to the latest proposal will not
> infringe on Monotype's MTX compression IP. Agreed ?

Yes, it kind of goes without saying - you cannot infringe on anything if
you don't implement it.