On Jul 9, 2009, at 12:08 AM, Thomas Lord wrote: > Suppose that all of that is fine with you > and Erik and the font vendors. You can separate > representation from logical structure and have a more binary > friendly format such as MIME. You can work with, > perhaps extending, the ccREL vocabulary. I'l have a look, thanks. Two concerns though. At first glance it seems ccREL offers licensing info on elements that end up on a page, which implies some sort of UI behaviour. A font would not have a straightforward location for such data, as it is everywhere and nowhere. Working with ccREL would mean trying to convince the Creative Commons about adding support for non-CC proprietary stuff? While these are all sympathetic folks, it would just be another uphill battle. I think we can take ideas from proposals like ccREL, it certainly helps to be able to point to precedence. > I would suggest that > the meta-data should be HTML. In which context would this be visible? ErikReceived on Thursday, 9 July 2009 07:27:03 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:01:40 UTC