RE: the discussion is over, resistance time

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Thomas Lord [mailto:lord@emf.net]

>On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 01:47 +0000, Sylvain Galineau wrote:
>> >-----Original Message-----
>> >From: Thomas Lord [mailto:lord@emf.net]
>>  However, if you can't get that right over email, imagine what else
>you could be missing....
>>
>
>Let's talk on Monday.
>
>I think I'm less non-savvy than you think,
>just more dramatic and a bit more brash than
>you might like.
There you go again, assuming I think you're non-savvy. You don't know what I like either; and if I didn't like it, again: would I be taking the time ?


On dramatic, you're right on. I'm sure it's fun for you, but like all things, it's less effective if you do it all the time. Trust me: I know. Some guys
are pretty good at dramatic though...(yes Hakon, I thought of you...sigh...)

>I think there's *some* (not necessarily good,
>but *some) chance you, me, Chris, howcome@,
>and others can shock the hell out of everyone
>else by suddenly agreeing about a bunch of
>stuff.
Frankly, I like to think so too.


>A chance, anyway.  The break for
>the fourth certainly won't hurt that chance.
Enjoy.