W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-dom@w3.org > October to December 2005

Re: An apparent batik failure

From: Cameron McCormack <cam-www-dom@aka.mcc.id.au>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 17:51:54 +1100
To: www-dom@w3.org
Message-ID: <20051222065153.GA25862@port.mcc.id.au>

Ray Whitmer:
> There is one simple example of well-formed xml being rejected because  
> of the xml namespace declaration.  I cannot duplicate the sequence of  
> things that caused inkscape to place the xmlns:xml declaration into  
> the document header.  It is even possible I was editing a drawing  
> from an older version or even slightly possible that I had added it  
> myself trying to overcome errors being reported on the xml:space  
> attributes.  I found internet archives of others who had experienced  
> such problems as well.

Thanks, I'll investigate when I get back from my holiday.

Cameron
(taking a break from the Phuket beaches right now)

-- 
 Cameron McCormack			ICQ: 26955922
 cam (at) mcc.id.au			MSN: cam (at) mcc.id.au
 http://mcc.id.au/			JBR: heycam (at) jabber.org
Received on Thursday, 22 December 2005 06:52:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 22 June 2012 06:13:58 GMT