Ray Whitmer wrote: > I think there is no mention of being able to skip the event if the > replacement is a replacement with the current value. Except then no modification happened, so it makes no sense to fire a modification event... This is assuming we mean string replacement, not replacement of one Attr node with another. -BorisReceived on Saturday, 24 December 2005 05:47:22 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 3 May 2007 00:17:18 GMT