W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-dom@w3.org > July to September 1998

Re: NodeList interface

From: Claude Zervas <czervas@Adobe.COM>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1998 13:54:33 -0700
Message-Id: <>
To: www-dom@w3.org

At 06:20 PM 9/25/98 -0400, keshlam@us.ibm.com wrote:
>>> The standard kluge-around for almost tolerable efficiency seems to be to
>>> have NodeList cache everything it finds,
>>Is this really necessary, as opposed to just caching the current
>>(i.e. last fetched) position?
>Depends on how you expect people to use this monstrosity, and how
>inefficient you're willing to be if they insist on accessing nodes out of
>>> refresh that cache if the tree structure has changed
>>This is the really expensive item, I think.  Does anyone have a
>>quick'n'dirty way of doing this?
>... check its recorded count
>against the actual count ... etc

When the DOM becomes thread-safe in Level 2 (which I assume is a goal) most of
these NodeList cursor cacheing techniques will probably fail. (At least in the
case of two threads traversing the same NodeList).

It would be a good idea for the WG to release a interim iterator spec before
Level 2 so that implementors/users who need them will all be on the same page
and not have to wait another year for the complete level 2 draft.

- Claude Zervas
Received on Friday, 25 September 1998 16:54:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 20 October 2015 10:46:04 UTC