"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@virgin.net> wrote: > As a generality I'd say *aim* for minimal (KISS principle). > I was a little concerned with, for instance, all the 'nice to have's' > appearing after Michael's proposed summary. Though a lot of the follow-up items were from me, I would agree. However, we also need to know where the design is likely to go as it grows. KISS is not a good thing if the designers are blind to the curves ahead. Make a list of potential user requirements, then purposefully say what we're not going to do on the first pass. Have a rough plan, even though we may only implement 10% of the plan. -scottReceived on Sunday, 7 May 2000 13:45:57 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Friday, 25 March 2005 11:19:25 GMT