Philippe promised to check this with the appropriate person at W3C. Unless I hear from him within an hour and a half, I'll make a new distribution stating 2002 only. On Wednesday, February 13, 2002, at 07:13 , Joseph Kesselman wrote: > > You definitely want to get a lawyer's advice, but: General practice I've > seen is to state both the first year whatever-it-is was copyrighted and > the > year of the most recent set of revisions: "Copyright 2001, 2002 > by ...." > > ______________________________________ > Joe Kesselman / IBM Research >Received on Wednesday, 13 February 2002 14:40:01 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 6 April 2009 12:58:45 GMT