comments inlined On Monday, February 11, 2002, at 08:35 , Arnold, Curt wrote: > Edward Hieatt has been very responsive and if the patch that I submitted > this morning passes his review, I would expect that he would update > JSUnit > very quickly. However, I think that tomorrow mid-day might be to soon > to > expect an updated JSUnit and I would prefer not to include a JSUnit that > does not correspond to a released version. > [dd] I agree. We could probably post the patch so that it is publically available, but I also prefer to use a "standard" JsUnit. > The version numbers are explictly written in the manifest files along > with > copyright and other information. I would appreciate someone else > updating > them appropriately. They are not part of the transform but are in the > java > subdirectory (java/dom1-core.mf and java/junit/junit-run.mf, if memory > serves). > [dd] I found them and updated them to 1.0 status, as per TS release. If I'm wrorn, rebuilding the java files is not that big a problem, so I could do it next iteration. > Are you building the distributable with Ant? There should be a task > like > dom1-core-dist that would build everything repeatably. > > [dd] I missed this one completely as it is not listed among the targets you see with 'ant usage'.Received on Monday, 11 February 2002 21:39:01 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 6 April 2009 12:58:45 GMT