- From: Dimitris Dimitriadis <dimitris@ontologicon.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 03:50:26 +0100
- To: "Arnold, Curt" <Curt.Arnold@hyprotech.com>
- Cc: "'www-dom-ts@w3.org'" <www-dom-ts@w3.org>
On second thought, paying respect to the fact that E. Hieatt has indeed been responsive and Curt has invested lots of time into the JsUnit issue, we may want to consider releasing the Java part of the TS now (since we have no issues with it, as far as I can see) and allow for some more time in order to release a proper ECMA TS. I think this is the safest way to go about. People's views? If so, tomorrow mid-day is not to soon, given that we release Java only. /Dimitris On Monday, February 11, 2002, at 08:35 , Arnold, Curt wrote: > Edward Hieatt has been very responsive and if the patch that I submitted > this morning passes his review, I would expect that he would update > JSUnit > very quickly. However, I think that tomorrow mid-day might be to soon > to > expect an updated JSUnit and I would prefer not to include a JSUnit that > does not correspond to a released version. > > The version numbers are explictly written in the manifest files along > with > copyright and other information. I would appreciate someone else > updating > them appropriately. They are not part of the transform but are in the > java > subdirectory (java/dom1-core.mf and java/junit/junit-run.mf, if memory > serves). > > Are you building the distributable with Ant? There should be a task > like > dom1-core-dist that would build everything repeatably. >
Received on Monday, 11 February 2002 21:49:35 UTC