- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 11:04:40 -0700
- To: "Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu" <kanghaol@oupeng.com>
- CC: W3C Public Archive <www-archive@w3.org>
On 07/31/2012 01:14 AM, Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu wrote: > (Cc -www-style +www-archive) > > (12/07/31 9:17), fantasai wrote: >>> # For replaced elements, the min-content and max-content sizes are >>> # the same and correspond used size of the replaced element according >>> # to the ‘auto’ width and height calculations. >>> >>> s/correspond/corresponding to/ ? >> >> No, the grammar is correct here. Maybe s/same/equivalent/ would help >> though. > > Could you help me a bit train my English parser :p ? Is "correspond" > here a verb? Why is it not "correspond to"? Actually, it's missing "to the". Checked in. :) ~fantasai
Received on Tuesday, 31 July 2012 18:05:08 UTC