W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > July 2012

Re: [css3-writing-modes] editorial comments on Appendix D: Intrinsic Dimensions

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 11:00:07 -0700
Message-ID: <50181D27.1050607@inkedblade.net>
To: "Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu" <kanghaol@oupeng.com>
CC: W3C Public Archive <www-archive@w3.org>
On 07/31/2012 01:14 AM, Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu wrote:
> (Cc -www-style +www-archive)
>
> (12/07/31 9:17), fantasai wrote:
>>>     # For replaced elements, the min-content and max-content sizes are
>>>     # the same and correspond used size of the replaced element according
>>>     # to the ‘auto’ width and height calculations.
>>>
>>> s/correspond/corresponding to/ ?
>>
>> No, the grammar is correct here. Maybe s/same/equivalent/ would help
>> though.
>
> Could you help me a bit train my English parser :p ? Is "correspond"
> here a verb? Why is it not "correspond to"?

Huh, I thought there was a "to" there. Yes, it should be "correspond to". :)

~fantasai
Received on Tuesday, 31 July 2012 18:00:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:44:08 UTC