W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > July 2012

Re: [css3-writing-modes] editorial comments on Appendix D: Intrinsic Dimensions

From: Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu <kanghaol@oupeng.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 16:14:11 +0800
Message-ID: <501793D3.2080504@oupeng.com>
To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
CC: W3C Public Archive <www-archive@w3.org>
(Cc -www-style +www-archive)

(12/07/31 9:17), fantasai wrote:
>>    # For replaced elements, the min-content and max-content sizes are
>>    # the same and correspond used size of the replaced element according
>>    # to the ‘auto’ width and height calculations.
>>
>> s/correspond/corresponding to/ ?
> 
> No, the grammar is correct here. Maybe s/same/equivalent/ would help
> though.

Could you help me a bit train my English parser :p ? Is "correspond"
here a verb? Why is it not "correspond to"?
-- 
Web Specialist, Oupeng Browser, Beijing
Received on Tuesday, 31 July 2012 08:15:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:44:08 UTC