- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 17:01:34 +0100
- To: "Steve Faulkner" <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Cc: "Jonas Sicking" <jonas@sicking.cc>, "Paul Cotton" <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, "Sam Ruby" <rubys@intertwingly.net>, "Maciej Stachowiak" <mjs@apple.com>, "Philippe LeHegaret" <plh@w3.org>, "Jeff Jaffe" <jeff@w3.org>, www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 16:47:25 +0100, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> wrote: > The editor had more than a reasonable amount of time to get to the > revert request, he found time to respond to other bugs and publicly > respond to the working group decision to make the revert against his > wishes. Replying to a bug and answering some questions does not mean Ian had access to the source document where the edit needs to be made. And even if he did, the steps taken now are way more harmful than waiting a little longer. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Friday, 11 November 2011 16:02:25 UTC