Re: Consensus. was: Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification

Julian Reschke wrote:
> Dean Edridge wrote:
>> Julian Reschke wrote:
>>>
>>> But volume of comments can be an indicator of whether something has 
>>> consensus or not.
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> ... that clearly is not stable, nor has consensus, and also could 
>>> *easily* be specified separately.
>>
>> Consensus among whom?
>
> Consensus in the HTML WG.
>

So the people in the HTML WG are the only ones contributing to HTML5 then?


-- 
Dean Edridge