W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > November 2008

Re: Consensus. was: Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 15:34:38 +0100
Message-ID: <4928187E.60300@gmx.de>
To: Dean Edridge <dean@dean.org.nz>
CC: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>

Dean Edridge wrote:
> So the people in the HTML WG are the only ones contributing to HTML5 then?

Not necessarily.

But if the W3C HTML WG can't decide about what's in an W3C spec and 
what's not, why do we have it in the first place?

If the only desire is to slap a W3C label on something that is somebody 
else's activity, we should be clear about it.

BR, Julian
Received on Saturday, 22 November 2008 14:35:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:18:19 GMT