Re: Consensus. was: Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification

Dean Edridge wrote:
> Julian Reschke wrote:
>>
>> But volume of comments can be an indicator of whether something has 
>> consensus or not.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> ... that clearly is not stable, nor has consensus, and also could 
>> *easily* be specified separately.
> 
> Consensus among whom?

Consensus in the HTML WG.

Best regards, Julian