Re: discretion in adding issues [was: respecification of document.write...]

On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 14:21 +0900, Michael(tm) Smith wrote:
[...]
> Regardless, to get back to the point that needs to be made here:
> The raising of that group of issues represents, absolutely, a
> misuse of the tracker, and the only thing that we need to spend
> any further time on is considering which (if any) of them should
> actually be taken up as open issues for the group.

I looked them over, in collaboration with Mike and Shawn.

There's some useful substance to this one:

ISSUE-48 -- 'marks' content markup attribute for Q (quotation)

I'm not sure about 43.

For the others, (42 to 50) we marked them closed,
product none, with a pointer to this thread.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E