-public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org Robert J Burns <rob@robburns.com>, 2008-05-31 12:44 +0000: > [...] I know I had a discussion with members of this WG over > email about it IIRC, the discussion included Gregory Roasmaita > and at least one other hostile participant (for some > perspective, I count a hostile participant as someone who > rejects or otherwise criticizes a proposal for adding too much > implementation complexity when the proposal doesn't call for > addin any implementation at all[1]). I hope you can understand you are not helping yourself at all by creating a "hostile participant" category and placing into it somebody who took time to respond to one of your proposals. Nor are you helping yourself much by elsewhere using words like "insanity" to refer to his comments. In this particular case, I think you've misunderstood Andrew. And knowing him myself, I can certainly say that you have misread him as being hostile. But what you have probably accomplished is to make it more likely that he'll be disinclined to comment positively on any further proposals you might put forward. --Mike -- Michael(tm) Smith http://people.w3.org/mike/ http://sideshowbarker.net/
Received on Wednesday, 4 June 2008 05:40:13 UTC