Re: 2nd Call: Full Potential: Who's counting?

Doug,

your response absolutely confirms my assertion:

> Members of working groups are interpreting the current charters to  
> prevent discussion of whether their charter is actually meeting the  
> needs of end-users.  I have personal experience of this in respect
> of public lists and or phone conferences for WAI, SVG and CSS groups


regards

may I remind you that in  2000 the Accessibility features of SVG  
document was originally written by two w3c staff members and has not  
been updated since?

 >> do deny that I told you you would "not be welcome at Cannes".

 >> meetings are rather costly

 >> save the thorny stuff for F2F meetings

 >>debunking empty claims