W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > February 2007

Re: path to last call for GRDDL; agenda sync?

From: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 12:48:39 -0500
Message-ID: <45D1F9F7.7010102@ibiblio.org>
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: www-archive@w3.org

By schedule I mean the one on our web-page that I got the CG to approve
[1] a while back, going from Last Call to PR by the end of 1st Quarter
2007. The end of first call PR is March 31st. Therefore, we need to at
very worse case go into Last Call for the minimum of 3 weeks, i.e. the
end of the 1st week of March. However, ideally we'd have more time in
Last Call.

I think all the tests in the critical path have more or less worked out
and issues are closed - it's a matter of editing the spec text, so I'm
going to press for Last Call this telecon.

I will relent in any of the editors feel they need one more week. But
that's absolutely it.

[1]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/

Dan Connolly wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 12:15 -0500, Harry Halpin wrote:
>   
>> OK,
>>     Some (maybe most!) of those tests were critical path as our closing
>> of issues is dependent on it, give me 15 minutes and I'll separate those
>> into critical path and non-critical path tests.
>>     Anyways, keep working on the spec!
>>     
>
> Will do.
>
>   
>>  It's looking better and better.
>> I'll send my comments shortly
>>     
>
> I have lost track of how many pending comments there are. :-/
> I suppose that's what last call is all about, in a way.
> "Are there any comments I/we forgot?"
>
>   
>>  - in essence, I can delay one week to go
>> to Last Call. However, delaying two weeks is not acceptable, as it will
>> come dangerously close to throwing us off schedule.
>>     
>
> I wonder what you mean by that. We're already off schedule. It's been
> more than 3 months since we published. Our schedule
> has us going to last call in January
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/#sched . You asked the CG
> to change that, but "We can then remain in Last Call for the 
> required 3 weeks up till the end of March and still be on schedule"
> seems circular, to me. Still be on _what_ schedule?
>
> One literal reading of "delaying two weeks is not acceptable"
> is that you'd rather close the WG than delay 2 weeks.
>
>   
>>>  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/weekly-agenda
>>>       
>
>
>   


-- 
		-harry

Harry Halpin,  University of Edinburgh 
http://www.ibiblio.org/hhalpin 6B522426
Received on Tuesday, 13 February 2007 17:49:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:18:02 GMT