On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 12:15 -0500, Harry Halpin wrote: > OK, > Some (maybe most!) of those tests were critical path as our closing > of issues is dependent on it, give me 15 minutes and I'll separate those > into critical path and non-critical path tests. > Anyways, keep working on the spec! Will do. > It's looking better and better. > I'll send my comments shortly I have lost track of how many pending comments there are. :-/ I suppose that's what last call is all about, in a way. "Are there any comments I/we forgot?" > - in essence, I can delay one week to go > to Last Call. However, delaying two weeks is not acceptable, as it will > come dangerously close to throwing us off schedule. I wonder what you mean by that. We're already off schedule. It's been more than 3 months since we published. Our schedule has us going to last call in January http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/#sched . You asked the CG to change that, but "We can then remain in Last Call for the required 3 weeks up till the end of March and still be on schedule" seems circular, to me. Still be on _what_ schedule? One literal reading of "delaying two weeks is not acceptable" is that you'd rather close the WG than delay 2 weeks. > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/weekly-agenda -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29EReceived on Tuesday, 13 February 2007 17:30:29 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 July 2008 08:09:56 GMT