Re: Re: Ã?sthetic Permissive License - For Approval

Sean B. Palmer scripsit:

> Since I'm not a lawyer, I presume that users will appreciate any
> available stringent license review, especially given that testing a
> license in the judicial system is hardly possible for a new license.

Well, Larry (who is a lawyer but not your lawyer) certainly gave you a
(a)stringent review.

Since the license meets the McQuary limit, it might be useful to use
it as a .sig, where even the MIT or 2-clause BSD licenses would be
excessively wordy.

Perhaps it should be renamed the Email Public License.

-- 
You escaped them by the will-death              John Cowan
and the Way of the Black Wheel.                 cowan@ccil.org
I could not.  --Great-Souled Sam                http://www.ccil.org/~cowan