- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 10:14:45 -0500
- To: Rob Burns <robburns1@mac.com>
- Cc: www-archive@w3.org, Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>
On Mon, 2007-08-20 at 09:43 -0500, Rob Burns wrote: > Hi Dan and Chris, > > Sorry for the confusion. I didn't realize you meant all process: as > in even a motion like this. That's understandable. > I thought you were more referring to > "process" as in the delicate interpersonal matters that my last > "process" email may have caused. Anyway, no harm, no foul. > > This proposal was very poorly received, so I'm convinced it needs no > further airing. I am a little concerned how process issues that > should be dealt with on the list can be handled, off-list, but I'm > sure we'll get the details ironed out. If the process issue should be dealt with on the list, then some combination of the chairs and the proposers will take it there. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Monday, 20 August 2007 15:15:00 UTC