W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > August 2007

Re: process proposals should start off-list [was: ... categorize messages and threads]

From: Rob Burns <robburns1@mac.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 09:43:54 -0500
Message-Id: <3DCC6DA4-A550-409D-8509-D75F87C59AFD@mac.com>
Cc: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>
To: www-archive@w3.org

Hi Dan and Chris,

Sorry for the confusion. I didn't realize you meant all process: as  
in even a motion like this. I thought you were more referring to  
"process" as in the delicate interpersonal matters that my last  
"process" email may have caused. Anyway, no harm, no foul.

This proposal was very poorly received, so I'm convinced it needs no  
further airing. I am a little concerned how process issues that  
should be dealt with on the list can be handled, off-list, but I'm  
sure we'll get the details ironed out.

Take care,
Rob

original message
----------------------
On Aug 20, 2007, at 9:22 AM, Dan Connolly wrote:

>
> On Sun, 2007-08-19 at 07:12 -0500, Rob Burns wrote:
>> Hello All WG Members,
>>
>> Motion to use prefix to categorize messages and threads
>
> This is clearly process discussion. Perhaps I was too
> subtle when I asked 17 Aug 2007 that...
>
> [[
> In order to keep public-html@w3.org focussed on the technical
> work of this group, I encourage everyone to take process
> issues up directly with the involved people and/or the chairs.
> ]]
>  --  http://www.w3.org/mid/1187367862.29837.628.camel@pav
>
> If you have a process suggestion, please run it by the chairs
> (and perhaps a few early reviewers) before sending it to
> public-html.
>
> Follow-ups to this thread to the chairs, please, with
> copy to www-archive@w3.org unless it's sensitive.
Received on Monday, 20 August 2007 14:44:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:18:08 GMT