W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > November 2006

(no subject)

From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 19:03:41 +0100
Message-ID: <1475014116.20061124190341@w3.org>
To: "Charles McCathieNevile" <chaals@opera.com>
Cc: "T.V Raman" <raman@google.com>, steve@w3.org, dino@w3.org, <dbaron@dbaron.org>, <ian@hixie.ch>, <mjs@apple.com>, <w3c-html-cg@w3.org>, <timbl@w3.org>, <www-archive@w3.org>

On Thursday, November 23, 2006, 3:20:16 PM, Charles wrote:

CM> On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 11:58:29 +0100, Charles McCathieNevile  
CM> <chaals@opera.com> wrote:

>> On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 23:27:16 +0100, T.V Raman <raman@google.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I concurr with Steve, and strongly disagree with the later
>>> suggestion on this thread that two parallel versions of the
>>> charter be maintained with a pointer being passed around to the
>>> alternative --- I for one would not feel comfortable voting on
>>> either  version of any of the charters if that were the case.
>>
>> I agree with Raman that having made the proposals they should stand. I  
>> am disappointed that the feedback that various people including myself  
>> raised seemed to have been ignored in the proposal, but W3C is like  
>> that. I will make the same suggestions in my AC review, as significant  
>> change requests.

CM> Hmm. I don't know which charter drafts I was reading. Some of the most
CM> significant changes I requested most strongly were in fact made in the
CM> proposal.

I thought so, and was surprised when you mentioned they were 'ignored
as usual'. Glad that has been cleared up.



-- 
 Chris Lilley                    mailto:chris@w3.org
 Interaction Domain Leader
 Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group
 W3C Graphics Activity Lead
 Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Sunday, 26 November 2006 07:24:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:18:00 GMT