W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > November 2006

Re: Re:

From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 15:20:16 +0100
To: "Charles McCathieNevile" <chaals@opera.com>, "T.V Raman" <raman@google.com>, steve@w3.org
Cc: dino@w3.org, chris@w3.org, dbaron@dbaron.org, ian@hixie.ch, mjs@apple.com, w3c-html-cg@w3.org, timbl@w3.org, www-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.tjg3f2ruwxe0ny@pc058.coreteam.oslo.opera.com>

On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 11:58:29 +0100, Charles McCathieNevile  
<chaals@opera.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 23:27:16 +0100, T.V Raman <raman@google.com> wrote:
>
>> I concurr with Steve, and strongly disagree with the later
>> suggestion on this thread that two parallel versions of the
>> charter be maintained with a pointer being passed around to the
>> alternative --- I for one would not feel comfortable voting on
>> either  version of any of the charters if that were the case.
>
> I agree with Raman that having made the proposals they should stand. I  
> am disappointed that the feedback that various people including myself  
> raised seemed to have been ignored in the proposal, but W3C is like  
> that. I will make the same suggestions in my AC review, as significant  
> change requests.

Hmm. I don't know which charter drafts I was reading. Some of the most  
significant changes I requested most strongly were in fact made in the  
proposal.

cheers

Chaals

-- 
   Charles McCathieNevile, Opera Software: Standards Group
   hablo español  -  je parle français  -  jeg lærer norsk
chaals@opera.com          Try Opera 9 now! http://opera.com
Received on Thursday, 23 November 2006 14:20:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:18:00 GMT