W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > November 2006

[www-archive] <none>

From: Dean Jackson <dino@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 02:59:40 +1100
Message-Id: <47499E5F-AF68-41DA-8298-24DF317AA99C@w3.org>
Cc: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Hypertext CG <w3c-html-cg@w3.org>, Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, www-archive@w3.org
To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>, Steve Bratt <steve@w3.org>
Hi Chris, Steve,

Maciej, Ian and David have given useful feedback on the HTML WG  
charter. What is the process by which this feedback is considered?

Does it have to wait until it is submitted by the AC review?

If some of the feedback is accepted then it might be a significant  
change to the charter. Does this mean an extra round of AC review is  
required?

Or, if everyone "here" agrees, is it possible to change the charter  
currently under review?

[I'm not sure who is included in "here" - the people that have  
replied so far? the entire list of people cc-ed?]

Dean
Received on Wednesday, 22 November 2006 16:01:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:18:00 GMT