I think the only issue resolutions were 421 and 422 ( Comments and the redundant namespace entry in the table in Part 1 ). I'm sorting out the TOC now, Yves is on holiday Gudge > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jean-Jacques Moreau [mailto:jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr] > Sent: 11 April 2003 14:22 > To: Martin Gudgin > Cc: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen; Marc Hadley; Nilo Mitra; Noah > Mendelson; W3C Public Archive; ylafon@w3.org; David Fallside; > Carine Bournez (E-mail) > > Ah... I was planning on spending some time this afternoon > incoporating issue resolutions. Did you also do any of that? > > Apart from this (and cleaning up the TOC! -but Yves is good > at doing this!-), I don't see anything else that needs doing. > > Thanks for creating the snapshots, > > JJ. > > PS. I'll on IRC shortly to speed up communication. > > Martin Gudgin wrote: > > > As you may have seen from mail from me on the WG list, the spec > > documents have been updated for PR. I've made the agreed changes, > > removed diff markup and removed change logs. I've generated > snap shots > > at each stage of the process. > > > > I think all that needs doing now is the following: > > > > 1. Update namespace URIs > > 2. Update status/boilerplate for PR > > > > Does anyone know of anything else that needs doing? > > > > I'm happy to do #1 for all three parts + schemas docs, I > just need to > > know what URIs we're going to use. > > > > I'm hoping Yves/Carine can do #2 > > > > Regards > > > > Gudge > > >Received on Friday, 11 April 2003 09:24:04 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 July 2008 08:08:57 GMT