The AI list also mentions issue 355: > 2003/04/09: Editors > Incorporate 'proper' of Issue 355 (not fully implemented previously) So did you do both of 421 and 422? JJ. Martin Gudgin wrote: > I think the only issue resolutions were 421 and 422 ( Comments and the > redundant namespace entry in the table in Part 1 ). > > I'm sorting out the TOC now, Yves is on holiday > > Gudge > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Jean-Jacques Moreau [mailto:jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr] >>Sent: 11 April 2003 14:22 >>To: Martin Gudgin >>Cc: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen; Marc Hadley; Nilo Mitra; Noah >>Mendelson; W3C Public Archive; ylafon@w3.org; David Fallside; >>Carine Bournez (E-mail) >> >>Ah... I was planning on spending some time this afternoon >>incoporating issue resolutions. Did you also do any of that? >> >>Apart from this (and cleaning up the TOC! -but Yves is good >>at doing this!-), I don't see anything else that needs doing. >> >>Thanks for creating the snapshots, >> >>JJ. >> >>PS. I'll on IRC shortly to speed up communication. >> >>Martin Gudgin wrote: >> >> >>>As you may have seen from mail from me on the WG list, the spec >>>documents have been updated for PR. I've made the agreed changes, >>>removed diff markup and removed change logs. I've generated >> >>snap shots >> >>>at each stage of the process. >>> >>>I think all that needs doing now is the following: >>> >>>1. Update namespace URIs >>>2. Update status/boilerplate for PR >>> >>>Does anyone know of anything else that needs doing? >>> >>>I'm happy to do #1 for all three parts + schemas docs, I >> >>just need to >> >>>know what URIs we're going to use. >>> >>>I'm hoping Yves/Carine can do #2 >>> >>>Regards >>> >>>Gudge >> >> >Received on Friday, 11 April 2003 09:26:36 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 July 2008 08:08:57 GMT