- From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 22:55:37 -0800
- To: "Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com>, "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <moreau@crf.canon.fr>, "Marc Hadley" <marc.hadley@sun.com>, "Noah Mendelson" <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: "W3C Public Archive" <www-archive@w3.org>, "Nilo Mitra" <EUSNILM@am1.ericsson.se>, "David Fallside" <fallside@us.ibm.com>
Status: 8 is still pending Gudge's recovery. Otherwise done >Marc and I went through the remaining of Gudge's issues for >Part 2 and here's what we think we (spec editors) need to do: > >>8. Section 4.2.2 >> >> The numbered bullets use the term 'terminal node', but >>that term no longer exists in the data model. We should >>rewrite in terms of nodes with a lexical value. > >Pending Gudge's recovery > >>9. Section 4.4 >> >> The language in the numbered bullets doesn't seem >>consistent with other language concerning infoset items > >Add text to the first occurance of "Value of Code" as in part 1. done Henrik Frystyk Nielsen mailto:henrikn@microsoft.com
Received on Tuesday, 10 December 2002 01:56:10 UTC