Editorial comments for Part 1, section 4-app A

General Comments
----------------

* We are inconsistent in the use of the term "SOAP message infoset".
Variants include

- SOAP message infoset
- SOAP Message Infoset
- SOAP envelope infosets
- SOAP XML Infoset
- Envelope XML infosets 

I would recommend: "SOAP message infoset"

* We are inconsistent in the use of the term "infoset" in places not
covered by the above. Variants include

- Infoset
- infoset
- XML Infoset
- XML infoset

I would recommend: "XML infoset"

* I assume the new namespace will be

	http://www.w3.org/2002/12/*

Specific Comments
-----------------

* S5.2.1, bullet 4: Add bullet for "relay" attribute information item

* S5.2.4, 3 (just after bullet list): xs:boolean should be marked
(italic)

* S5.3 bullet list: Is it intentional that Body can't contain any
character II children even if header blocks and fault detail can?

* S5.3.1, bullet 1: Why do we have a namespace note on the body child
elements descendents but not on header block descendents? Also, the
former says "MAY" namespace qualify whereas the latter says "SHOULD".
Shouldn't we be consistent?

* S5.4, P2 (just after bullet list): Change "only child of the SOAP
Body" with "only child of the SOAP Body element information item"

* 5.4.7.2, P1: Change "TheSupportedEnvelope" to "The SupportedEnvelope"

Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
mailto:henrikn@microsoft.com