- From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 12:06:34 -0800
- To: "Marc Hadley" <marc.hadley@sun.com>, "Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com>, <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>, "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <moreau@crf.canon.fr>, "Nilo Mitra" <EUSNILM@am1.ericsson.se>
- Cc: "Anish Karmarkar" <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>, "David Fallside" <fallside@us.ibm.com>, <www-archive@w3.org>
General Comments ---------------- * We are inconsistent in the use of the term "SOAP message infoset". Variants include - SOAP message infoset - SOAP Message Infoset - SOAP envelope infosets - SOAP XML Infoset - Envelope XML infosets I would recommend: "SOAP message infoset" * We are inconsistent in the use of the term "infoset" in places not covered by the above. Variants include - Infoset - infoset - XML Infoset - XML infoset I would recommend: "XML infoset" * I assume the new namespace will be http://www.w3.org/2002/12/* Specific Comments ----------------- * S5.2.1, bullet 4: Add bullet for "relay" attribute information item * S5.2.4, 3 (just after bullet list): xs:boolean should be marked (italic) * S5.3 bullet list: Is it intentional that Body can't contain any character II children even if header blocks and fault detail can? * S5.3.1, bullet 1: Why do we have a namespace note on the body child elements descendents but not on header block descendents? Also, the former says "MAY" namespace qualify whereas the latter says "SHOULD". Shouldn't we be consistent? * S5.4, P2 (just after bullet list): Change "only child of the SOAP Body" with "only child of the SOAP Body element information item" * 5.4.7.2, P1: Change "TheSupportedEnvelope" to "The SupportedEnvelope" Henrik Frystyk Nielsen mailto:henrikn@microsoft.com
Received on Monday, 9 December 2002 15:07:29 UTC