W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-annotation@w3.org > July to December 2002

RE: Annotea Schemas

From: Claus <filter@privat.dk>
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2002 18:03:16 +0200
To: "'Marja-Riitta Koivunen'" <marja@w3.org>, "'www-annotation'" <www-annotation@w3.org>
Message-ID: <001001c23c99$9cf044d0$89b6a483@home>

OK makes sense, thank you for your answer.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marja-Riitta Koivunen [mailto:marja@w3.org]
> Sent: 1. august 2002 20:30
> To: Claus; www-annotation@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Annotea Schemas
> 
> 
> No need for fear.
> 
> We wanted to separate them so that people not wanting to use 
> our Annotation 
> subtypes can still use  the basic Annotation schema and just 
> include their 
> own types. For instance, Amaya has a a special file 
> (config/annot.schemas 
> in the Amaya installation directory) that can be edited to 
> define what 
> schemas to include. Right now we always use both definitions.
> 
> Marja
> 
> At 12:33 PM 8/1/2002 +0200, Claus wrote:
> 
> >In deepest fear of this beeing a stupid question
> >I was wandering if anyone could please explain
> >to me why the rdfs:Class Annotation resides in
> >
> >http://www.w3.org/2000/10/annotation-ns#
> >
> >When all other rdfs:Class' are in
> >
> >http://www.w3.org/2000/10/annotationType#
> >
> >What is the difference? Thanks in advance.
> >
> >/Claus
> 
> 
> 
Received on Monday, 5 August 2002 12:02:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Friday, 25 March 2005 11:19:18 GMT