W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-annotation@w3.org > July to December 2002

Re: Annotea Schemas

From: Marja-Riitta Koivunen <marja@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2002 14:30:12 -0400
Message-Id: <>
To: "Claus" <filter@privat.dk>, <www-annotation@w3.org>

No need for fear.

We wanted to separate them so that people not wanting to use our Annotation 
subtypes can still use  the basic Annotation schema and just include their 
own types. For instance, Amaya has a a special file (config/annot.schemas 
in the Amaya installation directory) that can be edited to define what 
schemas to include. Right now we always use both definitions.


At 12:33 PM 8/1/2002 +0200, Claus wrote:

>In deepest fear of this beeing a stupid question
>I was wandering if anyone could please explain
>to me why the rdfs:Class Annotation resides in
>When all other rdfs:Class' are in
>What is the difference? Thanks in advance.
Received on Thursday, 1 August 2002 14:31:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:16:55 UTC