W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-annotation@w3.org > July to December 1998

Re: Social impact of annotations?

From: Misha Glouberman <misha@web.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1998 13:04:05 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <3.0.32.19981030130358.00926e00@mail.interlog.com>
To: www-annotation@w3.org
Rolf,

You might want to have a look at my "Adding Comments to the Web" paper,
which talks a lot about social impact of annotations technologies. It's not
exactly a  cautious study of possibilities. (Okay- it's a
foaming-at-the-mouth rant) But it might be of use.

I'd be really interested in hearing what conclusions you come to about the
related-link feature. It sounds really interesting from what little I've
read, but I haven't had a chance to find out much about it.



			- Misha



At 12:42 PM 10/30/98 -0500, you wrote:
>(This list has not been very active lately; let me know if discussion
>of Web annotations has migrated to a different forum and I can repost
>my question there.)
>
>What, if any, will be the social impact of widely deployed third party
>Web annotation technology?  By third party I mean annotations that do
>not require the cooperation of the original Web Site provider.  So for
>example, I would not consider a link that a Web Site puts up to a
>hypermail discussion list to qualify as third party annotation.  In
>contrast, I would consider Netscape's Related Links functionality to
>be a kind of third party Web annotation.  
>
>-Rolf
>
>-- 
>| Rolf Nelson (rolf@w3.org), Project Manager, W3C at MIT
>|   "Try to learn something about everything
>|             and everything about something."  --Huxley
>
> 
>
>
>
Received on Friday, 30 October 1998 14:15:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Friday, 25 March 2005 11:19:16 GMT