- From: Misha Glouberman <misha@web.net>
- Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1998 14:31:02 -0500
- To: www-annotation@w3.org
Forgot the url. It's http://www.web.net/~misha/annot.html At 01:04 PM 10/30/98 -0500, you wrote: >Rolf, > >You might want to have a look at my "Adding Comments to the Web" paper, >which talks a lot about social impact of annotations technologies. It's not >exactly a cautious study of possibilities. (Okay- it's a >foaming-at-the-mouth rant) But it might be of use. > >I'd be really interested in hearing what conclusions you come to about the >related-link feature. It sounds really interesting from what little I've >read, but I haven't had a chance to find out much about it. > > > > - Misha > > > >At 12:42 PM 10/30/98 -0500, you wrote: >>(This list has not been very active lately; let me know if discussion >>of Web annotations has migrated to a different forum and I can repost >>my question there.) >> >>What, if any, will be the social impact of widely deployed third party >>Web annotation technology? By third party I mean annotations that do >>not require the cooperation of the original Web Site provider. So for >>example, I would not consider a link that a Web Site puts up to a >>hypermail discussion list to qualify as third party annotation. In >>contrast, I would consider Netscape's Related Links functionality to >>be a kind of third party Web annotation. >> >>-Rolf >> >>-- >>| Rolf Nelson (rolf@w3.org), Project Manager, W3C at MIT >>| "Try to learn something about everything >>| and everything about something." --Huxley >> >> >> >> >> > > >
Received on Friday, 30 October 1998 14:31:03 UTC