W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > wai-xtech@w3.org > May 2008

RE: Is Flickr an Edge Case? (was Re: HTML Action Item 54)

From: Sailesh Panchang <sailesh.panchang@deque.com>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 11:51:38 -0400
To: "'Michael A Squillace'" <masquill@us.ibm.com>, <wai-xtech@w3.org>
Message-ID: <483c2be9.4b9d220a.3811.59f2@mx.google.com>
David,

WCAG 2 says:

". Sensory: If non-text content is primarily intended to create a  specific
sensory experience

, then text alternatives at least provide descriptive identification of the
non-text content."

My understanding is that not all music needs to be captioned even if it
there is verbal audio content. 

Sailesh Panchang
Accessibility Services Manager (Web and Software)
Deque Systems Inc. (www.deque.com)
11130 Sunrise Valley Drive, Suite #140,
Reston VA 20191
Phone: 703-225-0380 (ext 105)
E-mail: sailesh.panchang@deque.com

  _____  

From: wai-xtech-request@w3.org [mailto:wai-xtech-request@w3.org] On Behalf
Of Michael A Squillace
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 11:20 AM
To: wai-xtech@w3.org
Subject: Re: Is Flickr an Edge Case? (was Re: HTML Action Item 54)

 


Even instrumental music? What about a song that has no lyrics, a classical
piece for instance? Do you plan to caption those, too? My point is that
music is as inheritly audio as photographs are visual and to render them
accessible to all in any way flies in the face of reasonableness. 

--> Mike Squillace
IBM Human Ability and Accessibility Center
Austin, TX

W:512.823.7423
M:512.970.0066

masquill@us.ibm.com
www.ibm.com/able 




"David Poehlman" <david.poehlman@handsontechnologeyes.com> 
Sent by: wai-xtech-request@w3.org 

05/27/2008 09:54 AM 


To

<wai-xtech@w3.org>, Michael A Squillace/Austin/IBM@IBMUS 


cc

 


Subject

Re: Is Flickr an Edge Case? (was Re: HTML Action Item 54)

 


 

 





Yes, every verbal audio should be captioned or texted.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Michael A Squillace" <masquill@us.ibm.com>
To: <wai-xtech@w3.org>
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 8:59 AM
Subject: Re: Is Flickr an Edge Case? (was Re: HTML Action Item 54)


Reposting as not sure msg made it through first time....

I must admit that I'm a little staggered at the amount of conversation 
flickr has produced with regard to alt tags. Responding, here, as a 
totally blind web content 
consumer and not as a member of the IBM Human Ability & Accessibility 
Center, you can put all of the alt tags on flickr that you desire - I'm 
still not going to visit 
it because photos are inheritly visual entities. For the dozen or so 
photos that have received thousands of views (and that, presumably, 
resemble the news 
broadcast rather than the private telephone call), 100 or 150 characters 
of alt text is not going to make the photo any more useful to me. Are we 
next going to 
suggest that all of the songs available on the web need closed caption so 
that deaf folks can enjoy them, too?  As someone who is blind, I realized 
a long time 
ago that photography, driving, and painting are endeavors in which I am 
simply not going to engage and I think it detracts from the conversation 
about the real 
utility of alt to concentrate on what I see as, indeed, an edge case. Of 
course, I am only one person and I'm sure that many of my colleagues and 
fellow PWDs 
will vehemently disagree with me.


--> Mike Squillace
IBM Human Ability and Accessibility Center
Austin, TX

W:512.823.7423
M:512.970.0066

masquill@us.ibm.com
www.ibm.com/able
Received on Tuesday, 27 May 2008 15:43:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 13:15:49 GMT