- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2018 21:39:04 +0100
- To: sduchateau@access42.net
- Cc: wai-eo-editors@w3.org
Thank you Sylvie, I addressed these typos. We are also looking into the bugs you found in the tool. Many thanks, Shadi On 05/11/2018 12:52, Sylvie Duchateau wrote: > Hello, > > Following instructions on the EO survey, here are some typos I noticed > in the accessibility statement. > > 1. ON page: https://w3c.github.io/wai-statements/planning/statements/#main > > Paragraph: –Examples of accessibility statements > > The following example accessibility statements were created using this > generator tool: > > Proposal: The following examples of accessibility statements were > created using this generator tool: > > > 2. In the two examples of accessibility statements, you talk sometimes > from work days :"We aim to respond to accessibility feedback within 5 > work days, " > Then further in the text: propose a solution within 10 working days. > Not sure which of both is correct in English. May be make this consistent? > One can find this also in the tool itself: Typical duration for response > (Example: "2 work days") > Best > Sylvie > -- > Access42 > > *Sylvie DUCHATEAU* > Experte accessibilité numérique > 09 72 45 06 14 — 06 62 33 68 12 > > Expertise et formation en accessibilité numérique > > Site web <https://access42.net/> — Twitter > <https://twitter.com/access42net> — LinkedIn > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/access42> — Newsletter > <http://eepurl.com/dgHY2b> > > Organisme de formation référencé dans le Datadock > -- Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ Accessibility Strategy and Technology Specialist Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
Received on Tuesday, 6 November 2018 20:39:08 UTC