W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ua@w3.org > January to March 2009

RE: UAAG, error handling and HTML5

From: Jim Allan <jimallan@tsbvi.edu>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 11:59:19 -0600
To: "'David Poehlman'" <poehlman1@comcast.net>, "'Jan Richards'" <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>
Cc: "'Henny Swan'" <hennys@opera.com>, <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
Message-ID: <000901c99772$c8d5a3c0$5a80eb40$@edu>
A good topic-good issue. The agenda is a bit full this week. I will add it
to the agenda for the 5 March meeting.

Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-ua-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ua-request@w3.org] On Behalf
Of David Poehlman
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2009 12:30 PM
To: Jan Richards
Cc: Henny Swan; w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
Subject: Re: UAAG, error handling and HTML5

I would like to believe that, but what about backward compatibility?   
What about user agents that do not use styles?  There needs to be a  
fallback.

On Feb 24, 2009, at 1:12 PM, Jan Richards wrote:

Hi Henny,

In the example, the "required" fields are outlined in red because  
that's what the CSS says to do...

But, once HTML5 becomes a recommendation (and if "required" is a  
feature) I would expect browsers to do native parsing of the attribute  
resulting in some default highlighting behaviour AND in the case of  
accessible user agents conveying the semantic fact ("required") in a  
non-visual way as well.

Cheers,
Jan





Henny Swan wrote:
> Hi All,
> Forgive me as I'm still wading through UAAG and getting up to speed  
> with the spec, as such this may be a silly question with an obvious  
> answer but any thoughts would be greatly appreciated.
> Currently HTML5 is working to put in better error handling support  
> in forms so validation can be handled by the HTML and the browser.  
> An example can be found at
http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/tests/html5-forms-demo.html 
> . Currently, if you make a mistake the offending form field in  
> question is flagged by a red outline which only goes so far as in  
> aiding accessibility as non-sighted users, colour blind users,  
> people browsing with colours switched off and so on will not get the  
> information.
> So my question is, how far is the user agent responsible for  
> flagging errors? WCAG 2.0 has a number of Success Criteria that deal  
> with error handling [1] so I'm curious to know where the line is  
> drawn in terms of author responsibility (WCAG) and user agent  
> responsibility (UAAG) when HTML5 is thrown into the mix. Should the  
> browser and HTML5 support provision of accessible warnings or is it  
> down to the page author?
> Cheers, Henny
> [1]  http://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/minimize-error.html

-- 
Jan Richards, M.Sc.
User Interface Design Lead
Adaptive Technology Resource Centre (ATRC)
Faculty of Information (i-school)
University of Toronto

  Email: jan.richards@utoronto.ca
  Web:   http://jan.atrc.utoronto.ca
  Phone: 416-946-7060
  Fax:   416-971-2896




-- 
Jonnie Appleseed
with his
Hands-On Technolog(eye)s
reducing technology's disabilities
one byte at a time
Received on Wednesday, 25 February 2009 18:01:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:49:37 UTC