W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ua@w3.org > April to June 2002

Re: Proposal for Checkpoints 1.2, 9.5 and 9.6

From: David Poehlman <poehlman1@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2002 16:08:15 -0400
To: Jon Gunderson <jongund@uiuc.edu>, w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
Message-id: <016101c20ccc$bb4b6f60$91e03244@DAVIDPOEHLMAN>

I agree with the new label set.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jon Gunderson" <jongund@uiuc.edu>
To: <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 2:59 PM
Subject: Proposal for Checkpoints 1.2, 9.5 and 9.6

The following checkpoints are all related to the problem of authors not
using accessible design practices:
Checkpoint 1.2 Activate event handlers
Checkpoint 9.5 No events on focus change
Checkpoint 9.6 Show event handlers

The list discussion suggested that these were important requirements to
keep with one vote to remove the requirements altogether.

PROPOSAL: We create a new label called "repair" that would include this
of checkpoints and the following checkpoints:
Checkpoint 2.2 Provide text view. (P1)
Checkpoint 2.7 Repair missing content. (P2)
Checkpoint 2.8 No repair text. (P3)

These checkpoints I think are all related to repairing poorly authored

The advantage of a "repair" label is that we can keep the requirements,
still provide a means for user agents to conform even if they do not
implement these specific requirements.


Jon Gunderson, Ph.D., ATP
Coordinator of Assistive Communication and Information Technology
Division of Rehabilitation - Education Services
College of Applied Life Studies
University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign
1207 S. Oak Street, Champaign, IL  61820

Voice: (217) 244-5870
Fax: (217) 333-0248

E-mail: jongund@uiuc.edu

WWW: http://www.staff.uiuc.edu/~jongund
WWW: http://www.w3.org/wai/ua
Received on Wednesday, 5 June 2002 16:09:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:49:31 UTC