W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ua@w3.org > April to June 2002

Re: PROPOSAL: Requirements in Checkpoint 3.5 and 3.6

From: Marisa DeMeglio <marisa@dinf.ne.jp>
Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2002 16:26:35 -0400
To: Jon Gunderson <jongund@uiuc.edu>, w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
Message-id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020605154233.00bc7330@mailsv.dinf.ne.jp>

We haven't started an official UAG-implementation review of the Sigtuna 
browser, but it does make configurable the allowed number of redirects (0 
to unlimited).
But I can see how it would make sense to add this as a note on another 
checkpoint.

-marisa

At 02:11 PM 6/5/2002 -0500, Jon Gunderson wrote:

>Checkpoint 3.5 Toggle content refresh
>Checkpoint 3.6 Toggle redirects
>
>There is mixed reaction to these requirements.  Three people say keep and 
>two people say drop and add as a note to another checkpoint.
>
>PROPOSAL: I suggest we drop Checkpoint 3.6 and keep Checkpoint 3.5.  It 
>seems that this is easy to implement and was identified as a major problem 
>for screen reader users.  The requirements of checkpoint 3.6 could be a 
>note on 3.5.
>
>
>
>Jon Gunderson, Ph.D., ATP
>Coordinator of Assistive Communication and Information Technology
>Division of Rehabilitation - Education Services
>MC-574
>College of Applied Life Studies
>University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign
>1207 S. Oak Street, Champaign, IL  61820
>
>Voice: (217) 244-5870
>Fax: (217) 333-0248
>
>E-mail: jongund@uiuc.edu
>
>WWW: http://www.staff.uiuc.edu/~jongund
>WWW: http://www.w3.org/wai/ua
>

------------------------------------------
Marisa DeMeglio
marisa@dinf.ne.jp
IT Development
Information Center/JSRPD
www.dinf.org
------------------------------------------
Received on Wednesday, 5 June 2002 16:48:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 06:51:07 GMT